Static vs Streaming Responses: A Deep Dive into Real-time AI Chat Architecture

2025-08-246 min read

Static vs Streaming Responses: A Deep Dive into Real-time AI Chat Architecture

Building a modern AI chat interface, you'll inevitably face the question: should responses stream in real-time like ChatGPT, or arrive all at once? This post chronicles our journey from implementing fake typing effects to understanding the fundamental architectural challenges of true streaming responses with AWS Lambda and Bedrock.

The Starting Point: Fake Typing for Better UX

Our chat application initially used a simple approach - receive the complete AI response from AWS Bedrock, then simulate typing it out character by character:

// The "fake" streaming simulation we initially implemented
const simulateTyping = async (fullResponse: string) => {
  for (let i = 0; i < fullResponse.length; i++) {
    const char = fullResponse[i];
    const delay = char === ' ' ? 50 : char.match(/[.!?]/) ? 200 : 30;
    
    await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, delay));
    setDisplayText(fullResponse.substring(0, i + 1));
  }
};

This worked reasonably well for UX - users saw a "typing" effect that made the response feel more natural and gave visual feedback during processing. But it wasn't real streaming.

The Problem: A Hybrid Mess

The real issue emerged when we tried to support both modes. Our system had:

  • Real streaming attempt: Using a Lambda function with InvokeModelWithResponseStreamCommand
  • Fake streaming fallback: Character-by-character simulation when real streaming failed
  • Static responses: Bulk responses for reliability

This created a confusing user experience where the "Stream" toggle sometimes worked, sometimes fell back to fake typing, and sometimes just returned static responses. Users couldn't predict what they'd get.

Understanding Real Streaming with AWS

To implement true streaming, we dove deep into AWS documentation and discovered the architectural requirements:

AWS Bedrock Streaming Capability

AWS Bedrock supports real streaming through InvokeModelWithResponseStreamCommand:

const command = new InvokeModelWithResponseStreamCommand(params);
const response = await bedrockClient.send(command);

// Real streaming - process chunks as they arrive
for await (const chunk of response.body) {
  if (chunk.chunk?.bytes) {
    const chunkData = JSON.parse(new TextDecoder().decode(chunk.chunk.bytes));
    if (chunkData.type === 'content_block_delta' && chunkData.delta?.text) {
      // Send this token immediately to client
      yield chunkData.delta.text;
    }
  }
}

This actually works - Bedrock will send response tokens as they're generated by the model.

Lambda Function Streaming Requirements

However, Lambda functions have specific requirements for streaming:

  1. Function URL Required: Must use Lambda Function URLs, not API Gateway
  2. RESPONSE_STREAM Invoke Mode: Must explicitly configure streaming mode
  3. Streaming Runtime APIs: Need special runtime APIs to stream during execution
// Required configuration for Lambda streaming
backend.bedrockChatStream.resources.lambda.addFunctionUrl({
  authType: FunctionUrlAuthType.NONE,
  invokeMode: InvokeMode.RESPONSE_STREAM, // Critical!
});

The Real Challenge: Event-Driven Architecture

Our biggest discovery was that traditional Lambda functions are request-response only:

// Traditional Lambda - this CANNOT stream
export const handler = async (event: APIGatewayProxyEvent): Promise<APIGatewayProxyResult> => {
  let sseResponse = '';
  
  // This builds the ENTIRE response in memory
  for await (const chunk of bedrockResponse.body) {
    sseResponse += `data: ${JSON.stringify({ type: 'token', token: chunk })}\n\n`;
  }
  
  // Returns everything at once - NOT streaming!
  return {
    statusCode: 200,
    body: sseResponse
  };
};

This approach waits for the complete Bedrock response, formats it as Server-Sent Events (SSE), then returns everything in one payload. It's fake streaming disguised as real streaming.

The Architecture Mismatch

Our investigation revealed fundamental incompatibilities:

What We Had

  • Amplify Functions: Simplified Lambda deployment
  • GraphQL API: Request-response pattern
  • Next.js API Routes: Traditional HTTP request/response

What Streaming Needs

  • Lambda Function URLs: Direct Lambda invocation
  • Streaming Runtime: Special Lambda streaming APIs
  • WebSocket or SSE: Persistent connections

The Clean Solution: Embrace Static Responses

After understanding these complexities, we made a architectural decision: remove streaming entirely and optimize for fast, reliable static responses.

Why Static Responses Make Sense

  1. Simplicity: Clear request-response model
  2. Reliability: No complex streaming failure modes
  3. Performance: Often faster than streaming for short responses
  4. Debugging: Much easier to troubleshoot
  5. Compatibility: Works with all hosting environments

The Clean Implementation

// Clean, simple response handling
const handleResponse = async (response: Response) => {
  if (response.ok) {
    const data = await response.json();
    
    const assistantMessage: Message = {
      id: (Date.now() + 1).toString(),
      content: data.message, // Complete response, displayed immediately
      role: 'assistant',
      timestamp: new Date()
    };

    setMessages(prev => [...prev, assistantMessage]);
  }
};

UI Clarity

We simplified the interface to be crystal clear:

// Before: Confusing streaming toggle
<button className={`streaming-toggle ${useRealStreaming ? 'active' : ''}`}>
  {useRealStreaming ? '🔄 Live' : '⌨️ Typed'}
</button>

// After: Simple loading states
{isLoading && (
  <div className="loading-spinner">
    <span></span><span></span><span></span>
  </div>
)}

Performance Insights

Our testing revealed interesting performance characteristics:

  • Short responses (< 100 tokens): Static responses are faster
  • Medium responses (100-500 tokens): Similar performance
  • Long responses (> 500 tokens): Streaming provides better perceived performance

For most chat interactions, static responses delivered a better experience.

Lessons Learned

1. Complexity Has a Cost

Every additional mode (static, fake streaming, real streaming) multiplied our testing surface and potential failure points.

2. User Experience Trumps Technology

Users care about predictable, fast responses, not the underlying streaming technology.

3. Architecture Decisions Have Cascading Effects

Choosing Amplify Functions over raw Lambda limited our streaming options, but provided other benefits like easier deployment and GraphQL integration.

4. Documentation Doesn't Tell the Whole Story

AWS docs show how to implement streaming, but don't clearly explain the architectural constraints and trade-offs.

The Final Architecture

Our production system now uses:

// Single, optimized response path
const response = await client.queries.chat({
  message: userMessage.content,
  conversationId: conversationId || null,
  conversationHistory: JSON.stringify(completeHistory),
  clientIp: clientIp,
  userAgent: userAgent,
  stream: false // Always static
});

// Immediate display of complete response
const assistantMessage: Message = {
  id: (Date.now() + 1).toString(),
  content: response.data.reply,
  role: 'assistant',
  timestamp: new Date()
};

setMessages(prev => [...prev, assistantMessage]);

When to Choose Streaming vs Static

Choose Streaming When:

  • Responses are consistently long (> 500 tokens)
  • You have control over the full stack
  • Real-time feedback is critical
  • You can handle the complexity

Choose Static When:

  • Responses are typically short-medium
  • You need reliability over features
  • Your architecture has constraints
  • Development speed matters

Conclusion

Sometimes the best engineering decision is to remove complexity, not add it. Our journey from fake typing to real streaming taught us that user experience consistency often matters more than technical sophistication.

The chat interface is now faster, more reliable, and easier to maintain. Users get their answers quickly without the uncertainty of which "streaming" mode they're experiencing.

In the world of AI interfaces, sometimes the most advanced approach is the simplest one that actually works.

This post documents our actual implementation experience with AWS Bedrock, Lambda, and Next.js. Your mileage may vary depending on your specific architecture and requirements.

← Back to Home